In July 1518, a woman named Frau Troffea walked into a street in Strasbourg and started dancing. She did not stop for days. Within a week, 34 other people had joined her. Within a month, the number had swelled to around 400 people, all dancing uncontrollably through the streets, unable to stop, some of them dying from the effort.
The medical authorities of Strasbourg decided the best treatment was to build a stage, hire musicians, and make them dance more.
This is one of the most thoroughly documented cases of mass hysteria in recorded history, and it is absolutely wild from start to finish.
How It Started
The initial details come from city records, physician notes, and chronicles of the time, which makes the 1518 dancing plague unusually well-documented for a 16th century event. Strasbourg was in a bad way that summer. Famine had been grinding the region for years. Diseases including smallpox and syphilis were widespread. The population was in a state of sustained misery and stress that modern researchers have compared to chronic collective trauma.
Into this context stepped Frau Troffea, whose first name has been lost to history. She began dancing on or around July 14, 1518, and continued for somewhere between four and six days without meaningful rest. She bled from her feet. She did not appear to be dancing for joy. By contemporary accounts, she seemed unable to stop, sometimes going limp and collapsing, then rising and starting again.
Physicians examined her and declared she had a “natural disease.” The city council debated whether this was God’s judgment or demonic possession. Both explanations were taken completely seriously. Nobody knew what was actually happening, because nobody in 1518 had a framework for mass psychogenic illness.
The City’s Baffling Response
By mid-August, the dancing had spread to roughly 400 people. People were having strokes and heart attacks from the sustained physical exertion. Contemporary records mention deaths, though the exact number is unclear. The city had a genuine public health emergency on its hands, and it responded in the most interesting possible way.
The initial response was to try to contain the dancing by giving it a proper venue. The city council cleared the horse and grain markets and opened a guildhall. They hired professional musicians to play for the dancers, reasoning that the music might help control or eventually end the episode. They brought in strong men to keep the dancers upright and moving, apparently reasoning that rest might cause harm.
This made everything worse. The music attracted more participants. More people joined the dancing. The city had accidentally created the world’s first involuntary rave with a fatality rate.
Eventually the authorities reversed course. The musicians were sent away. Dancing in public was banned. The afflicted were taken to the mountaintop shrine of St. Vitus, the patron saint of people with nerve disorders, where they were given red shoes (exactly as weird as it sounds) and encouraged to pray. The dancing plague gradually died out by September 1518.
What Was Actually Happening
The honest answer is that we do not know with complete certainty, but the most accepted modern explanation is mass psychogenic illness, also known as conversion disorder or mass hysteria.
The historian John Waller, who wrote the most thorough modern account of the episode, argues that the 1518 dancing plague fits the pattern of stress-induced mass psychogenic illness almost perfectly. The affected population was under extreme, sustained psychological and physical stress from famine, disease, and economic collapse. Many of the initial participants were young women, who in that social environment had fewer sanctioned ways to express distress. The dancing provided a kind of release that was simultaneously socially transmitted.
A key piece of evidence for this interpretation is that similar episodes occurred repeatedly in the same region during the medieval and early modern periods. There were multiple dancing plagues recorded in the Rhineland and Low Countries between the 11th and 17th centuries. This was not a random event. It was a recurring response pattern in populations under specific types of collective stress.
The religious context also mattered. St. Vitus was associated with compulsive movement disorders, and there was a widespread belief in the region that the saint could both cause and cure such afflictions. This gave the behavior a culturally coherent script: if you were dancing involuntarily, you must have been cursed by St. Vitus, and the response was to go dance at his shrine. The community collectively provided a narrative that made the experience legible.
This Happened More Than Once
The 1518 Strasbourg episode is the most famous, but the dancing plague had precedents and sequels. In 1374, a mass dancing episode began in Aachen, Germany, and spread to multiple Rhine valley cities. Thousands participated, with accounts of people dancing until they collapsed and died. The episodes tend to cluster around periods of particular economic or social stress.
More recently, researchers studying mass psychogenic illness have documented similar episodes in modern populations. A 2011 incident in Le Roy, New York, saw 18 teenagers develop tic disorders with no clear neurological cause. A 2007 incident in Peru affected over 600 students. The underlying mechanisms appear to be stable features of human social psychology, regardless of era.
What changes is the culturally specific form the illness takes. In 1518, the available script was dancing and St. Vitus. In 2011, it was tic disorders. The brain, under certain conditions, borrows the most available framework for expressing distress in a way that can spread socially.
Why This Belongs at the Dinner Table
The dancing plague of 1518 is not just a historical curiosity. It is a window into how human minds and bodies respond to sustained, collective stress, and how communities construct meaning around experiences they cannot understand.
The city of Strasbourg’s decision to hire musicians and build a stage for involuntary dancers is one of the great examples of well-intentioned intervention making a crisis worse. The parallel to some modern responses to social contagion is left as an exercise for the reader.
History keeps producing stories like this one: events so strange that they read as fiction, documented in enough detail that the strangeness cannot be explained away. For more of the same, the story of how the internet collectively decided to want its 2016 back in 2026 shares some interesting structural similarities, if you squint. Collective behavior under stress tends to rhyme across centuries. Also, Wolf Worm by T. Kingfisher covers body horror with the same mix of dark humor and historical resonance that the dancing plague deserves, if that sort of thing appeals to you. And if you want another case of humans being confounded by inexplicable things happening all at once, look at the 2026 fireball surge.
Four hundred people danced themselves toward death in a French city in the summer of 1518, and the best response anyone could come up with was to hire a band. The world has always been this way. We just forget, until something reminds us.
Sources
- Waller, John. A Time to Dance, A Time to Die: The Extraordinary Story of the Dancing Plague of 1518. Icon Books, 2008.
- Strasbourg city council records, July-September 1518 (Archive de la Ville et de la Communaute Urbaine de Strasbourg).
- Bartholomew, Robert E. Little Green Men, Meowing Nuns and Head-Hunting Panics: A Study of Mass Psychogenic Illness and Social Delusion. McFarland, 2001.
🐾 Visit the Pudgy Cat Shop for prints and cat-approved goodies, or find our illustrated books on Amazon.
