The cat-lady stereotype did not arrive fully formed with a television character or an internet joke. Older images and records show people using cats to make judgments about women. They do not give us a single, tidy birth date for the modern insult.
The useful question is what each surviving source actually shows. A witchcraft accusation, a satirical print and a suffrage postcard are different kinds of evidence. Joining them into one uninterrupted story can make the history sound more certain than it is.
An accusation is evidence of a belief
The Essex Record Office preserves records connected to the 1566 prosecution of Agnes Waterhouse, Joan Waterhouse and Elizabeth Francis. Its account by historian Marion Gibson explains both the case and the printed pamphlet that publicized it.
Waterhouse was executed at Chelmsford on 29 July 1566. The familiar claim that she was the first woman executed for witchcraft in England is misleading: earlier executions had taken place under other legal categories, including heresy and treason.
Stories about animal familiars belong to the accusations and beliefs surrounding such trials. They are not descriptions of demonstrated supernatural events, and the presence of a cat does not establish a woman’s motives, household circumstances or mental health. That distinction is essential when reading material produced by accusers.
The old maid as a visual joke
A surviving print titled Old Maids at a Cat’s Funeral makes the association visible. Women mourning a cat become the subject of caricature. The title tells the viewer how to interpret them before the viewer has considered anything else.
My reading of the image is that affection for an animal is being used as a shortcut for judging the people who express it. That is an interpretation of this particular satire, not proof that every unmarried woman lived with cats or that one print invented the stereotype.
It also illustrates a recurring problem with jokes treated as social evidence. A caricature shows what someone thought an audience might recognize. It does not provide a reliable census of the people being caricatured.
Cats could argue both sides of a political campaign
The National Park Service’s collection-based history of cats and suffrage describes images that used cats to ridicule women’s political demands. It also records a very different feline role: the kitten Saxon accompanied Nell Richardson and Alice Burke on their 1916 campaigning journey.
That contrast matters. The animal was not a fixed symbol with one meaning. Opponents could make it a belittling comparison; campaigners could make it a companion and mascot. The meaning depended on who controlled the picture and the story around it.
Cat ownership is not a psychiatric diagnosis
A 2017 study by Francesca Solmi and colleagues examined cat ownership during pregnancy and childhood in relation to psychotic experiences during adolescence. After adjustment for potential confounders, it found no evidence of an association in that cohort.
This does not settle every question about Toxoplasma gondii, infection or mental health. Cat ownership and confirmed infection are different exposures, and an observational study cannot answer every causal question. It does show why a stigmatizing nickname is a poor substitute for carefully defined research.
There is no need to diagnose someone from the animals in their home. Nor should a discussion of stereotypes turn a study’s specific finding into an unlimited promise about health.
A familiar stereotype without a single origin
The evidence here supports several episodes in the association between women and cats. It does not establish the first ever use of the exact phrase “cat lady,” or prove that every later joke descended directly from witch trials.
Keeping those limits visible makes the argument stronger. Cats have repeatedly been used to compress a judgment about a woman into an image. The person disappears into the label; the animal becomes the explanation.
For the related history of beliefs about the animal itself, see our black-cat superstition article. The histories overlap, but neither can be reduced to the other. A cat can also simply be a cat, and a woman can enjoy its company without becoming a theory.
Visit the Pudgy Cat Shop for cat-inspired goodies, or find our illustrated books on Amazon.
