Enshittification is Cory Doctorow’s deliberately rude name for a pattern of platform decline: a service attracts users, shifts benefits toward businesses that want access to them, then extracts more value from both. It is a useful way to ask why an app can become less pleasant while remaining difficult to leave.
It is also a theory, not a clinical diagnosis for software. A price rise, an annoying redesign, or a feature you dislike does not by itself prove the entire pattern. The word is most useful when it helps you identify a change in incentives, rather than merely giving your complaint a satisfying number of syllables.
Table of Contents
- What is enshittification?
- The three stages
- Why leaving can be difficult
- Documented examples and their limits
- Five warning signs
- What you can do
- Frequently asked questions
What Is Enshittification?
Doctorow used the term in a November 2022 essay about Amazon and developed his three-stage formulation in a January 2023 essay about TikTok. The concern is how platforms redistribute benefits once the people who depend on them have fewer practical alternatives.
The American Dialect Society selected it as its 2023 Word of the Year. That recognizes its prominence; it does not certify every accusation made with it.
The profanity does useful emotional work. “The service has reduced the value of my established workflow” is accurate but unlikely to be the sentence you mutter when the export button disappears.
The Three Stages
In Doctorow’s model, the broad sequence looks like this:
- Attract users. Offer something useful enough that people arrive and build habits around it.
- Attract business customers. Use that audience to draw in sellers, advertisers, publishers, or developers.
- Extract more from both. Once both groups depend on the platform, change the bargain in the platform’s favor.
These are not official stages assigned by a standards body. Real services can mix business models, improve one feature while worsening another, or lose customers when they push too far. “Stage three” is an argument that needs evidence, not a label that supplies its own.
Why Leaving Can Be Difficult
Your Stuff Is There
Consider a hypothetical notes app. Moving ten notes is easy. Moving ten years of notes, attachments, shared folders, and links that colleagues use is a project. The subscription price is only one part of the cost of changing tools.
That does not mean the app deliberately designed every inconvenience. It means the inconvenience matters. When evaluating a replacement, the useful question is not just whether it has a nicer editor. It is whether your actual work can move with you.
Your People Are There
A messaging service can be technically replaceable and socially difficult to replace. You can install another app today; persuading a family group to move may require a diplomatic summit and someone explaining notifications to an uncle.
A service that connects people gets part of its usefulness from the people already using it. A better interface elsewhere may not compensate for their absence. That is why “just leave” is often less practical than it sounds.
The Interface Can Change the Deal
A ranking change can alter what gets noticed. An export limitation can change how easily work moves. An extra cancellation step can make leaving more burdensome. These are concrete changes to examine rather than reasons to assume every algorithm has one secret purpose.
Ask what changed, who benefits, and what evidence supports that interpretation. A company explanation may be incomplete or self-serving, but an angry screenshot can be incomplete too.
Documented Examples and Their Limits
Prime Video’s Advertising Change
Amazon announced advertising in Prime Video shows and movies for 2024, with rollout timing varying by country. The announcement offered US members an additional $2.99 monthly option to avoid those ads and said the revenue would support content investment. That is the price in the original announcement, not a claim about every country’s current plan.
This is a concrete example of an established subscription benefit changing. A customer can reasonably see less value in the same bundle. It does not follow that every ad-funded product is dishonest: the relevant issue is the bargain people were offered and how clearly a change is presented.
Apollo and Reddit’s API Pricing
In June 2023, Apollo developer Christian Selig announced the app’s closure, explaining that Reddit’s new API pricing and timetable made continued operation unviable for him. That is a documented developer account of why a third-party client was shutting down.
The broader lesson is dependency. A product built on another company’s access terms can be affected by changes outside its own code. Users who preferred that client lose an option even if their underlying account still exists.
Prime Enrollment and Cancellation
In September 2025, the FTC announced a $2.5 billion settlement with Amazon over allegations concerning Prime enrollment and cancellation. It included a $1 billion civil penalty, $1.5 billion in consumer refunds, and required changes to the processes.
The case concerns specific practices. It is not a ruling that every aspect of Amazon fits Doctorow’s theory. It does, however, show why the ability to leave a subscription deserves scrutiny alongside the ease of joining it.
Five Warning Signs Worth Checking
Use these as prompts, not a scoring system. There is no validated “three out of five means enshittified” test.
- You are paying more to retain the same feature. Compare the old and new terms, including what else changed.
- The service makes it harder to reach what you chose. Check whether a following view, direct subscription, or other control still exists.
- Leaving is disproportionately difficult. Notice unclear cancellation routes or repeated steps that add no useful protection.
- Your work is harder to export. Test what an export actually contains before depending on it.
- Important changes are poorly explained. Look for a changelog, pricing notice, or support answer that identifies the practical effect.
A single problem may be a bug, a tradeoff, or a bad decision. A persistent pattern deserves more attention. Keep the examples specific enough that another person can examine them.
What You Can Do Without Rebuilding Your Entire Digital Life
Start with One Exit Test
Choose one service containing something important to you. Export a small sample and check that another tool can open it. Keep the original until you know the transfer works. An unreadable backup is mostly a confidence trick performed on yourself.
For sensitive exports, choose a protected storage location and avoid leaving unnecessary copies behind. Portability should make you less dependent without making private information easier to expose.
Preserve a Direct Route
Doctorow’s “End to End” proposal argues that willing speakers should be able to reach willing listeners. For a reader, a practical version is bookmarking a publication or using its RSS feed where available, instead of relying entirely on a recommendation feed to remember it for you.
For a creator, consider which audience relationships exist outside one platform. That might be a website, a feed, or another direct channel suited to your work. You do not have to abandon discovery platforms to avoid making one of them your only door.
Judge Alternatives by the Actual Tradeoff
A paid service can change its terms. A nonprofit needs funding. Open-source software still needs maintenance, and running something yourself means taking responsibility for it. None of these labels is a permanent guarantee of quality.
Compare useful features, accessibility, export options, support, and the cost of maintaining the setup. Our password-manager comparison is one place to think through practical requirements rather than choosing solely by a business-model slogan.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Every Price Increase Enshittification?
No. Running a service costs money. The questions are what value changes, how clearly customers are informed, and whether they retain meaningful choices.
Does Paying Remove the Risk?
No. Payment establishes a commercial relationship, not permanent control over future product decisions. Look at the terms and your ability to move.
Can a Platform Improve Again?
Yes, individual decisions and features can change. The outcome is not predetermined by the label. Competition, customer pressure, regulation, and product choices may all matter; their effectiveness has to be evaluated in the particular case.
Is This the Same as the Dead Internet Theory?
No. Our dead internet explainer examines claims about automated online activity. Enshittification concerns the incentives and quality of services. They can overlap in a discussion without being interchangeable explanations.
The useful result of learning the word is a sharper question: what has changed about the service, and how much choice do I still have? The cat already asks a version of this whenever dinner changes. Its preferred complaint procedure is considerably less technical.
🐾 Curiosity looks good on you. Explore the Goodies, or find our illustrated books on Amazon.
