Vinyl Is Back. The Sales Figures Need a Little Unpacking.

Illustration of a cat with headphones holding a vinyl record beside a turntable.

Streaming gives you an enormous music library in your pocket. Vinyl asks you to buy furniture, handle the music carefully and stand up halfway through. Somehow, this is part of the sales pitch.

The revival is real, but “vinyl outsold CDs” needs a year, a country and a definition of sales. Otherwise a useful statistic turns into a format war conducted with incompatible calculators.

Units and dollars tell different stories

The RIAA’s 2022 US report recorded 41.3 million vinyl albums against 33.4 million CDs, describing the first vinyl lead in units since 1987. That corrects our earlier placement of the unit-sales milestone in 2020. Revenue leadership and unit leadership are different milestones.

For the more recent full year, the 2025 RIAA report lists 46.8 million vinyl units and 29.5 million CDs. Vinyl generated about $1.043 billion in US wholesale value, up 9.3% on the report’s comparable 2024 figure. RIAA now uses wholesale reporting, so those dollars should not be compared directly with older retail-value headlines.

These are US figures, not the entire world’s record collection. They support a substantial vinyl market, not a claim that streaming has been replaced.

The inconvenience can be the attraction

Choosing a record involves a small commitment. You pull it from a shelf, look at the sleeve and put it on. The music becomes an activity with a beginning, rather than something that happens while five other apps negotiate for your attention.

That does not make vinyl listeners morally superior. A distracted person can ignore a very expensive turntable, and an attentive listener can enjoy an album through a phone. The ritual simply offers one way to create space for listening.

Advertisement

The physical object matters too. Artwork, packaging and a visible collection can make music feel present in a room. Sometimes people want to own the thing they love, even when a subscription provides easier access to its sound.

Better sound is not a universal verdict

A record’s sound depends on the mastering, pressing, condition and playback equipment. Comparing formats without considering those differences is not a clean test of “analogue versus digital.”

You may prefer a particular release on vinyl. That preference is valid without claiming every record reproduces audio more accurately than every digital version. Surface noise can be nostalgic; it remains surface noise. The occasional crackle is not the artist adding a tiny campfire.

Buying an album is not the same as calculating an artist’s profit

A physical purchase can be a meaningful way to support music, especially when buying directly from an artist. But the sticker price is not the artist’s take-home income. Manufacturing, distribution, retailer shares and contractual arrangements all affect what remains.

Similarly, multiplying streams by a supposedly universal per-stream payment produces a misleading comparison. Spotify explains its royalty process through streamshare and payments to rights holders. Different transactions and rights arrangements cannot be reduced to one tidy exchange rate between a record and a playlist.

You do not have to choose a team

Use streaming to explore, buy an album you want to keep, borrow something unfamiliar or let a friend choose the next listen. Our guide to Spotify’s recommendation loop offers ways to make digital discovery more deliberate too.

Vinyl’s appeal is not that it wins every practical comparison. It is that practicality is not the only reason people love music. Now, if you will excuse us, side two is waiting.

Share this story

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *